Development

iECURE's ECUR-506 achieves 57% reduction in hyperammonemic events in OTC deficiency trial

iECURE reported statistically significant reductions in hyperammonemic events from the ECUR-506 OTC-HOPE trial, with the completed low-dose cohort showing a...

iECURE reported that pipeline candidate ECUR-506 produced statistically significant reductions in hyperammonemic events in the OTC-HOPE trial, with the completed low-dose cohort showing a 57% reduction in annualized hyperammonemic event rates and a 65% reduction in hyperammonemic crises. The findings, if sustained at higher doses, could challenge the chronic management paradigm that has defined ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC) deficiency treatment for decades.

The OTC-HOPE study is a first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation trial evaluating ECUR-506 in male infants up to seven months of age with genetically confirmed neonatal-onset OTC deficiency. The trial has dosed seven participants across three cohorts — low dose (1.3 × 10¹³ gc/kg, n=3), intermediate dose (2.4 × 10¹³ gc/kg, n=3), and high dose (4.0 × 10¹³ gc/kg, n=1) — with the primary objective of assessing safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a single intravenous administration.

ECUR-506 is an investigational in vivo gene insertion therapy that uses two adeno-associated virus vectors carrying distinct payloads: one delivers an ARCUS nuclease, licensed from Precision BioSciences (Nasdaq: DTIL), designed to create an insertion site within the PCSK9 locus in liver cells, and the second delivers a functional copy of the OTC gene for targeted insertion. The approach is designed to restore OTC enzyme activity and reduce toxic ammonia accumulation — the central pathological mechanism in OTC deficiency — through a single administration rather than the lifelong daily dosing required by current standard-of-care nitrogen scavengers.

Key results from the low-dose cohort

Data presented at the Society for Inherited Metabolic Disorders 2026 Annual Meeting covered the completed low-dose cohort (n=3), with a data cutoff of April 20, 2026, for the cohort-level analysis and February 11, 2026, for the first-treated patient.

The primary efficacy signal came from pre-dose to post-dose comparisons of annualized event rates per person-year. The low-dose cohort demonstrated a 57% reduction in annualized hyperammonemic events (p=0.018) and a 65% reduction in annualized hyperammonemic crises — defined as plasma ammonia exceeding 100 µmol/L with associated neurological status change (p=0.011). Two of three participants experienced no hyperammonemic events or crises following treatment; the third demonstrated meaningful reductions in event rates. One participant was removed from the liver transplant waiting list following treatment, while one proceeded to liver transplantation during long-term follow-up, consistent with clinical management decisions in this population.

The most detailed data came from the first infant treated, who showed zero hyperammonemic events through 18 months post-dose, achieved sustained discontinuation of ammonia scavenger therapy, and had dietary protein intake progressively liberalized to age-appropriate levels. The company noted that sustained clinical response in the absence of standard-of-care therapy is not typically reported in patients with neonatal-onset OTC deficiency.

Post-treatment outcomes in the cohort reflect a combination of ECUR-506 and ongoing standard-of-care management, a qualification that limits interpretation of the magnitude of the gene therapy's independent contribution.

The AllSci BriefSystematic R&D and deal news. Daily.

Across all dosed participants (n=7), ECUR-506 was generally well tolerated. No infusion-related reactions or thrombotic microangiopathy were reported. Asymptomatic transaminitis at Grade 2–3 was observed and managed with reactive immunosuppression, with no recurrence following taper — a pattern consistent with AAV-based gene therapy programs more broadly. One death occurred due to hypoxemic respiratory failure, assessed as unrelated to ECUR-506 and attributed to underlying OTC deficiency disease progression.

Competitive context for gene therapy in urea cycle disorder

The approved landscape for OTC deficiency treatment consists entirely of symptomatic therapies. Recordati Rare Diseases' Ravicti (glycerol phenylbutyrate), approved by the US FDA in 2013, and Immedica Pharma's Buphenyl (sodium phenylbutyrate) address nitrogen accumulation through alternative excretion pathways but do not correct the underlying genetic defect. Ucyclyd Pharma's Ammonul (sodium phenylacetate and sodium benzoate) serves as an intravenous rescue therapy during acute hyperammonemic crises. Liver transplantation remains the only available curative option, carrying significant surgical risk and requiring lifelong immunosuppression.

ECUR-506's ARCUS nuclease platform differs from other gene editing technologies in its cut mechanism, smaller size, and simpler structure, according to Precision BioSciences. Notably, the PCSK9 insertion locus strategy is designed to be variant-agnostic, potentially broadening applicability across the range of OTC mutations. Cross-trial comparisons are limited by differences in patient populations, disease severity, follow-up duration, and the absence of a randomized control arm in OTC-HOPE, so direct efficacy comparisons with other investigational gene therapy approaches for urea cycle disorders are not currently possible.

The iECURE clinical trial results presented at SIMD build on data shared the prior week at the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Annual Meeting, suggesting the company is pursuing an active data dissemination strategy as it moves toward dose selection.

Evaluation of the intermediate and high-dose cohorts is ongoing, with additional data expected to inform dose selection and the direction of future development. Participants transition to a 14.5-year long-term follow-up study (ECUR-LTFU) after completing the six-month main study, which will be central to characterizing the durability of the ECUR-506 clinical response over time — a key question for any gene insertion approach in a pediatric population.


This article was generated with AI assistance and reviewed and edited by the AllSci editorial team Explore more at AllSci News: https://allsci.com/news/


Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article