Novo Nordisk A/S (NOVO) held its Q2 2026 earnings call on August 5, 2026, during which the Phase III failure of ziltivekimab in cardiovascular outcomes dominated the R&D discussion, , while management defended CagriSema's competitive positioning versus tirzepatide and the outlined the next wave of obesity assets led by zenagamtide.
The call also suggested Novo is entering a transition period. While CagriSema remains an important near-term asset, management increasingly framed zenagamtide and its broader amylin-based pipeline as the next wave of obesity innovation, while continuing to defend investment in higher-risk cardiovascular inflammation programs despite the ZEUS setback.
Adjusted sales grew 7% at constant exchange rates to DKK 78.5 billion (USD 12.1 billion) in Q2; full-year adjusted sales growth guidance was revised to 0% to minus 6% at constant exchange rates, an improvement from prior guidance driven by GLP-1 volume growth.
ZEUS Failure Leaves Cardiovascular IL-6 Hypothesis Unresolved
The single most consequential pipeline disclosure was the ZEUS trial failure. EVP of R&D and Chief Scientific Officer Martin Lange confirmed that once-monthly ziltivekimab 15 mg, an anti-interleukin-6 (IL-6) monoclonal antibody, did not reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) versus placebo in more than 6,300 patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), with a hazard ratio of 0.99. Ziltivekimab did produce expected reductions in free IL-6 and hsCRP, confirming target engagement, but this did not translate into clinical benefit. Serious infection rates were higher with ziltivekimab, consistent with IL-6 pathway inhibition.
Lange said the result does not establish that inflammation is irrelevant to cardiovascular outcomes. He noted that the CANTOS trial demonstrated benefit with anti-IL-1 beta inhibition, and suggested IL-6 may be too far downstream in the inflammatory cascade in this specific population, or that the trial enrolled a heterogeneous disease population. Two further ziltivekimab cardiovascular outcomes trials — ARTEMIS in acute myocardial infarction and HERMES in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) — will continue, with readouts expected in H1 2027.
TD Cowen's Michael Nedelcovych pressed Lange on whether the ZEUS result, given the reduction in inflammatory biomarkers without MACE benefit, implies that hsCRP and IL-6 are correlates rather than causal drivers of cardiovascular risk. Lange declined to draw that conclusion, citing the upstream NLRP3 inflammasome pathway as a mechanistic rationale for continuing cardiovascular inflammation research. Novo said it has NLRP3 assets in both clinical and preclinical development and intends to advance them.
CagriSema: Non-Inferior on Weight, Inferior on Glycemic Control
The REIMAGINE 4 open-label head-to-head trial comparing CagriSema 2.4 mg (cagrilintide 2.4 mg/semaglutide 2.4 mg) versus tirzepatide 15 mg reported 68-week results. Lange said patients on CagriSema achieved 15.2% weight loss and a 1.9 percentage point reduction in HbA1c. CagriSema demonstrated non-inferiority to tirzepatide on weight reduction but failed to demonstrate non-inferiority on HbA1c reduction, the dual primary endpoint.
JPMorgan's Richard Vosser challenged management on the diabetes positioning given that HbA1c reduction is central to prescribing decisions in type 2 diabetes. Rather than focusing solely on glycemic efficacy, management increasingly positioned CagriSema as a differentiated amylin-based therapy, highlighting potential benefits in blood pressure, lipid metabolism and bone preservation alongside weight loss.
Novo confirmed the US regulatory decision for CagriSema in obesity remains on track for end-2026, with a potential launch in 2027. A new Phase IIIb trial has been initiated testing a higher fixed-dose combination of CagriSema comprising cagrilintide 2.4 mg and semaglutide 7.2 mg, with two substudies: one in obesity without diabetes and one in obesity with type 2 diabetes. The trial evaluates this higher dose against CagriSema 2.4 mg of each component and semaglutide 7.2 mg alone.