Boston-based Curium Pharma prevailed in a patent dispute brought by Novartis subsidiary Advanced Accelerator Applications (AAA) before the Delaware US District Court, with the judge ruling that all relevant patent claims asserted by Novartis/AAA are both invalid and not infringed by Curium’s lutetium Lu 177 dotatate product. The complete invalidation removes the principal legal barrier to Curium’s planned US commercial launch of a radioligand therapy for somatostatin receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, a market currently dominated by Novartis’s branded product.
Novartis retains the option to appeal the ruling, and the litigation record does not yet indicate whether AAA intends to do so. Specific patent numbers, expiry dates, and claim language are not disclosed in Curium’s announcement; the full scope of the invalidated claims would require review of the Delaware court docket.
Competitive context for the patent dispute
Novartis’s lutetium Lu 177 dotatate (Lutathera) holds US FDA approval for somatostatin receptor-positive GEP-NETs in adults and has been the sole approved radioligand therapy in this indication since its 2018 clearance. The litigation follows the established Hatch-Waxman pattern in which a follow-on manufacturer challenges originator IP to secure market entry, though the radiopharmaceutical sector operates under a distinct regulatory framework compared with conventional small-molecule generics. Curium’s product uses the same lutetium-177 dotatate radioligand approach as Lutathera, targeting somatostatin receptor-positive tumors.