Business

Teva secures ocrelizumab biosimilar rights across US and EU ahead of subcutaneous shift

Teva and Polpharma Biologics strike ocrelizumab biosimilar deal covering US, EU, and key global markets

Teva secures ocrelizumab biosimilar rights across US and EU ahead of subcutaneous shift

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (NYSE and TASE: TEVA) has entered a global licensing agreement with Switzerland-based Polpharma Biologics International AG, securing exclusive rights to commercialize Polpharma's proposed biosimilar to ocrelizumab (Ocrevus; Roche/Genentech) across the US, EU, Brazil, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Israel, and Turkey. The deal covers both the intravenous and subcutaneous formulations of the candidate, internally designated PB018. Polpharma retains full responsibility for development and manufacturing; Teva will handle regulatory submissions and commercialization in the licensed markets. Financial terms were not disclosed.

Why it matters

Ocrelizumab generated approximately USD 7.9 billion in annual global sales for Roche in 2025, making it one of the largest remaining biosimilar opportunities not yet secured by a major commercial partner across Western markets. The deal's dual-formulation scope is structurally notable: Roche's subcutaneous version, Ocrevus Zunovo (ocrelizumab and hyaluronidase-ocsq), received US FDA approval in September 2024 and is actively shifting prescriber preference away from the four-hour IV infusion. By securing rights to both formulations upfront, Teva avoids being stranded on a legacy IV product in a market migrating toward subcutaneous administration by the time PB018 could launch.

Deal context

This agreement represents the most commercially significant entry in Teva's biosimilar in-licensing program, which has followed a consistent capital-light template: the developer retains manufacturing and clinical risk, while Teva contributes regulatory infrastructure and commercial reach. The same structure governed Teva's January 2025 agreement with Samsung Bioepis for an eculizumab biosimilar (US-only scope) and its April 2024 and October 2024 agreements with mAbxience for oncology biosimilars — the latter involving USD 15 million in combined upfront and milestone payments, providing a rough benchmark for Teva's biosimilar deal economics.

For Polpharma, the Teva agreement functions as the anchor transaction in a deliberate geographic carve-out strategy for PB018. The MENA region was licensed to MS Pharma in September 2025, and Latin America excluding Brazil was licensed to Tuteur in May 2026. Polpharma has previously demonstrated the commercial viability of this model: its natalizumab biosimilar Tyruko launched in the US in November 2025 under a Sandoz commercialization partnership, establishing precedent for licensing MS biosimilars while retaining manufacturing.

The AllSci BriefSystematic R&D and deal news. Daily.

Industry and transaction context

The ocrelizumab biosimilar field is crowded and competitive. Samsung Bioepis added ocrelizumab to its pipeline in January 2026; Amgen completed a Phase III trial in early 2025; Celltrion is in active Phase III development. Teva's deal does not guarantee first-mover advantage — the commercial outcome will depend heavily on PB018's clinical development timeline relative to primary patent expiries (US: approximately October 2028; EU: March 2028) and on Teva's ability to secure formulary positioning in a multi-biosimilar market.

The geographic breadth of the Teva deal is unusual for a single-asset biosimilar commercialization agreement. Most structurally comparable transactions — including Polpharma's own vedolizumab deal with Fresenius Kabi, announced in August 2025, which excluded MENA — are regionally scoped. Covering US, EU, and multiple additional markets in a single agreement suggests Teva commanded a premium for its global commercial infrastructure, or that Polpharma prioritized execution certainty over maximizing per-region economics. The reference product's scale — and the compressed timeline to the patent window — likely made both considerations relevant.


This article was generated with AI assistance and reviewed and edited by the AllSci editorial team Explore more at AllSci News: https://allsci.com/news/


Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article